Skip to main content
. 2010 Jan 6;17(4):1010–1023. doi: 10.1245/s10434-009-0887-5

Table 2.

Operative features

Feature Total study population (N = 119)
Preoperative chemotherapy 119 (100%)
 Total no. of lines
  1 87 (73%)
  >1 32 (27%)
 Total no. of cycles
  <6 27 (24%)
  ≥6 85 (76%)
 Regimen last preoperative line
  5-FU LV 32 (27%)
  5-FU LV oxaliplatin 61 (51%)
  5-FU LV irinotecan 18 (15%)
  Other 8 (7%)
 Chronomodulated delivery 59 (50%)
 Clinical response at CT scana
  Response 72 (60%)
  Stabilization 28 (24%)
  Progression 19 (16%)
 Change in CEA level after chemotherapy (N = 113)b
  Response 75 (66%)
  Stabilization 14 (12%)
  Progression 24 (21%)
 Change in CA19.9 level after chemotherapy (N = 68)b
  Response 48 (71%)
  Stabilization 8 (12%)
  Progression 12 (18%)
Hepatectomy
 PVE 14 (12%)
 Major hepatectomy (≥3 segments) 62 (52%)
 Mean no. of CLM at histopathology ± SD 3 ± 3
 Mean maximum size of CLM at histopathology, mm ± SD 44 ± 36
 Surgical margin statusc
  R0 71 (60%)
  R1 43 (36%)
  R2 4 (3%)
 Postoperative mortality (≤2 months) 1 (1%)
 Postoperative complications 43 patients (36%)
  Hepaticd 31 (26%)
  Generale 20 (17%)
 Postoperative chemotherapy 105 (88%)

5-FU 5-fluorouracil, LV leucovorin, CT computed tomography, CEA carcinoembryonic antigen, CA carbohydrate antigen, PVE portal vein embolization, CLM colorectal liver metastases, SD standard deviation

aAccording to RECIST criteria22

bCutoff point 20%

cR0: complete surgical resection with a negative surgical margin at histopathology; R1: invaded surgical margins according to the pathologist; R2: macroscopic tumor remnant intraoperatively

dHepatic complications considered were: biliary leak/bilioma, hemorrhage, infected collection, noninfected collection, and transient liver insufficiency

eGeneral complications considered were: pulmonary, cardiovascular, urinary tract, infectious (other than local hepatic), and iatrogenic complications