Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Mar 17.
Published in final edited form as: Med Phys. 2006 Jun;33(6):1695–1706. doi: 10.1118/1.2198187

TABLE VI.

Comparison with Smekal’s method (ϕ=1.5000°, σ=1.2000°).

Standard deviation of Gaussian noise s=0.4 pixels

System parameters This method Smekal’s et al.
u0(pixel) 1005.9±0.3 0.005 367±2.2 × 10−6
Relative error 0.000 298 2 0.000 409 9
υ0(pixel) 480±1 0.004 564±0.000 655
Relative error 0.002 083 3 0.143 514 4
η(°) −0.99±0.03 −1.005±0.017
Relative error 0.030 303 0 0.016 915 4
RFD(mm) 401±1 2.489±0.020
Relative error 0.002 493 8 0.008 035 4