Table 3.
Characteristic | Number of respondents (%) * | Mean FOBt attitude score § | Bivariate OR (95% CI) | Significance |
---|---|---|---|---|
Practice Attributes | ||||
Practice list size | ||||
Less than 3,800 | 200 (20.8) | 6.0 | 1.1 (0.7 to 1.6) | p = 0.792 |
3,800 to 5,499 | 187 (19.5) | 5.9 | 0.9 (0.6 to 1.4) | p = 0.742 |
5,500 to 7,999 | 215 (22.4) | 5.9 | 0.9 (0.6 to 1.3) | p = 0.525 |
8,000 to 10,889 | 177 (18.4) | 5.9 | 1.0 (0.6 to 1.5) | p = 0.940 |
10,890 or more | 178 (18.5) | 5.9 | Reference | |
% of practice patients over 50 | ||||
Less than 25 | 96 (10.0) | 6.3 | Reference | |
25 to 49 | 530 (55.2) | 5.9 | 0.7 (0.5 to 1.1) | p = 0.118 |
50 to 74 | 245 (25.5) | 5.9 | 0.6 (0.4 to 1.0) | p = 0.053 |
75 to 100 | 3 (0.3) | 6.0 | 0.7 (0.1 to 8.0) | p = 0.774 |
Practice IMD quartile | ||||
Quartile 1 (least deprived) | 227 (23.6) | 5.9 | 0.7 (0.5 to 1.1) | p = 0.107 |
Quartile 2 | 276 (28.8) | 5.8 | 0.6 (0.4 to 0.9) | p = 0.012 |
Quartile 3 | 234 (24.3) | 5.9 | 0.7 (0.5 to 0.9) | p = 0.032 |
Quartile 4 (most deprived) | 223 (23.2) | 6.1 | Reference | |
Practice GP count | ||||
Single handed | 68 (7.1) | 6.2 | 1.3 (0.5 to 3.0) | p = 0.603 |
2 to 4 GPs | 495 (51.6) | 6.0 | 0.9 (0.4 to 1.8) | p = 0.733 |
5 to 7 GPs | 249 (25.9) | 5.8 | 0.7 (0.3 to 1.5) | p = 0.354 |
8 to 10 GPs | 115 (12.0) | 5.9 | 0.9 (0.4 to 2.0) | p = 0.794 |
11 or more GPs | 33 (3.4) | 6.0 | Reference | |
Socio-demographic characteristics | ||||
Ethnic group | ||||
White British | 719 (74.9) | 5.9 | Reference | |
Asian/Asian British | 150 (15.6) | 6.3 | 1.9 (1.3 to 2.7) | p = 0.001 |
Other | 88 (9.2) | 5.9 | 1.3 (0.8 to 2.0) | p = 0.334 |
Medical school affiliation | ||||
Yes | 259 (27.0) | 6.0 | 1.3 (1.0 to 1.8) | p = 0.094 |
No | 621 (64.7) | 5.9 | Reference | |
Personal experience of CRC screening | ||||
Yes | 98 (10.2) | 6.4 | 1.6 (1.1 to 2.4) | p = 0.044 |
No | 836 (87.1) | 5.9 | Reference | |
All respondents | 960 (100.0) | 5.9 |
* Percentages may not total 100 due to missing responses
§Minimum possible score = 3; maximum = 9: for calculation of Odds Ratios, scores were dichotomised, (scores of 6 or lower indicative of a negative attitude; 7 or higher showing a positive attitude). Reported OR indicate association between socio-demographic/practice characteristics and positive attitudes towards faecal occult blood testing