Skip to main content
. 2010 Mar 1;107(11):5232–5237. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0911972107

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Results for experiment 2. (A) Task is identical to experiment 1 except that the feature-contrast variable that was manipulated was the brightness of the targets relative to the distractors. (B) Correlations. (C) Bayesian model comparison. In all three subjects, M3 had a higher likelihood of explaining the data than M1 or M2. (D-F) Data and model fits for subject 1.