Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Androl. 2008 Dec 4;31(2):155–162. doi: 10.2164/jandrol.108.006098

Table 3.

Logistic Regression Models Evaluating The Relationship Between Circulating Levels of Estradiol (Total and Free) (Predictors) and Metabolic Syndrome (Outcome) in Older Men.

Variable O.R. [95%CI] P value*
Age-adjusted Log (Total Estradiol) (pmol/L) 2.69 [1.38–5.24] 0.004
Age-adjusted Log (Free Estradiol) (pmol/L) 3.35 [1.84–6.07] <.0001
Model 1*
Log (Total Estradiol) (pmol/L) 2.31 [1.39–4.70] 0.02
Log (Free Estradiol) (pmol/L) 2.69 [1.38–5.24] <0.001
Model 2 (Model 1+BMI + log (SHBG)+ total testosterone +log (DHEAS))
Log (Total Estradiol) (pmol/L) 2.61 [0.96–6.85] 0.053
Log (Free Estradiol) (pmol/L) 2.59 [1.01–6.66] 0.048
Model 3 (Model 1+ BMI)
Log (total Estradiol) (pmol/L) 1.79 [0.77–4.09] 0.18
Log (Free Estradiol) (pmol/L) 2.11 [1.03–4.33] 0.041
*

Model 1: each line refers the results of a separate model adjusted for age, smoking, alcohol, physical activity, log (IL-6) and log (Insulin).