Skip to main content
. 2010 Jan 20;25(4):321–325. doi: 10.1007/s11606-009-1227-y

Table 1.

Characteristics of 393 Patients Who Underwent IVC Filter Placement

Patients undergoing IVC filter placement
N = 393
N (%) or mean ± SD
Age (mean years ± SD) 60.5 ± 15.5
Age
 <50 years 89 (22.6)
 50–69 years 190 (48.3)
 ≥70 years 114 (29.0)
Female 194 (49.4)
Race
 White 261 (66.4)
 Black 28 (7.1)
 Latino 15 (3.8)
 Asian-American/Pacific Islander 49 (12.5)
 Other/unknown 40 (10.2)
Language
 English 325 (82.7)
 Spanish 14 (3.6)
 Chinese 14 (3.6)
 Other 9 (2.3)
 Unknown 31 (7.9)
Admitting service
 General medicine 120 (30.5)
 Surgicala 215 (54.7)
 Otherb 58 (14.8)
Type of filter placed
 Retrievable 280 (71.2)
 Non-retrievable or unknown filter type 113 (28.8)
Primary indication for filter placement
 VTE, anticoagulation contraindicated 294 (74.8)
 VTE, on anticoagulation or unspecified 39 (9.9)
 High risk for VTE from surgery 28 (7.1)
 Other 32 (8.1)
Comorbid medical conditions
 History of malignancy 203 (51.7)
 Prior VTE 87 (22.1)
 Hypertension 109 (27.7)
 Coronary artery disease 41 (10.4)
 Congestive heart failure 30 (7.6)
 Chronic lung disease 35 (8.9)
Length of stay (mean days ± SD) 22.5 ± 24.7
Anticoagulation at dischargec
 None 232 (59.0)
 Warfarin only 53 (13.5)
 Enoxaparin plus warfarin 36 (9.2)
 Enoxaparin only 46 (11.7)
Disposition
 Home 211 (53.8)
 Skilled nursing facility/rehabilitation center 95 (24.2)
 Other acute care facility 32 (8.2)
 Death 54 (13.8)

IVC = inferior vena cava, SD = standard deviation, VTE = venous thromboembolism

aSurgical services were: general, cardiothoracic, head and neck, gynecologic, transplant, neurosurgery, orthopedics, vascular, and urology

bOther services were: cardiology, cancer service, gynecology, pediatrics, and neurology

cInformation on anticoagulation use at discharge was missing for 26 individuals