Skip to main content
. 2009 Sep 30;277(1678):57–63. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2009.1538

Table 1.

Multiple regression model predicting log-transformed post-test testosterone concentrations in the female condition. (For the full model: F3,73 = 31.83, p < 0.001. CAG repeat number and baseline cortisol jointly accounted for 10% of the residual variance in post-test testosterone that was not explained by baseline testosterone. Predictor variables were uncorrelated with each other)

predictor variables standardized β ΔR2
step 1 0.53**
 log baseline testosterone 0.73
step 2 0.05*
 CAG repeat number −0.15
 log baseline cortisol −0.15

*p < 0.05.

**p < 0.0001.