Skip to main content
. 2009 Aug 19;7(44):485–497. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2009.0200

Figure 7.

Figure 7.

Qualitative predictions of steady-state flow patterns around a flexible wing. (a,b) A positively cambered flexible wing (a), such as one generated due to wing veins, is predicted to generate greater leading-edge vorticity and hence higher net forces than a rigid wing (b). In contrast, a negatively cambered flexible wing (c) is predicted to generate less leading edge vorticity than the rigid wing.