Figure - PMC

Skip to main content

View full-text article in PMC

. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Apr 1.

Published in final edited form as: Biochim Biophys Acta. 2010 Jan 4;1798(4):788–800. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2009.11.024

Measured (■) and calculated (–) RA vs angle of incidence for the symmetric CD₂ stretching vibration of a monolayer of DPPC-d₆₂ on an H₂O subphase at 21°C and a surface pressure of 28mN/m. The best fit to the data was found using an acyl chain tilt angle of 26°. The calculated lines are shown along with the experimental data for s- and p-polarized light. (reprinted with permission (pending) from ). (Figure courtesy of Professor Arne Gericke, of Kent State University).

Inline graphic — Measured (■) and calculated (–) RA vs angle of incidence for the symmetric CD₂ stretching vibration of a monolayer of DPPC-d₆₂ on an H₂O subphase at 21°C and a surface pressure of 28mN/m. The best fit to the data was found using an acyl chain tilt angle of 26°. The calculated lines are shown along with the experimental data for s- and p-polarized light. (reprinted with permission (pending) from ). (Figure courtesy of Professor Arne Gericke, of Kent State University).