Table 4.
Summary Data from Direct Endocardial/Epicardial Signal Comparison
Canine Model |
Average Signals |
Average XC | % XC > 0.8 | Average DF Endo |
Average DF Epi |
% DF Match |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Control | 55±19 | 0.76±0.07 | 27±33§ | 6.22±0.98§ | 6.83±1.14*§ | 49±20§ |
MR | 55±10 | 0.78±0.05§ | 46±33†§ | 5.69±1.14†§ | 6.05±0.66*†§ | 53±15§ |
CHF | 54±13 | 0.77±0.04§ | 30±35§ | 6.86±0.72† | 7.89±1.72*†§ | 66±30†§ |
RAP | 58±13 | 0.74±0.04 | 12±13† | 7.08±0.91† | 8.76±1.26*† | 26±10† |
Meth | 48±11 | 0.75±0.05 | 19±25 | 6.69±1.12 | 7.25±1.23§ | 41±20§ |
ANOVA | P = 0.01 | P<0.0001 | P<0.0001 | P<0.0001 | P<0.0001 |
p<0.01 in paired t-test between Endo and Epi DFs
p<0.05 vs Control
p<0.05 vs RAP