Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Heart Rhythm. 2010 Jan 11;7(4):506–517. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2009.12.030

Table 4.

Summary Data from Direct Endocardial/Epicardial Signal Comparison

Canine
Model
Average
Signals
Average XC % XC > 0.8 Average DF
Endo
Average DF
Epi
% DF
Match
Control 55±19 0.76±0.07 27±33§ 6.22±0.98§ 6.83±1.14*§ 49±20§
MR 55±10 0.78±0.05§ 46±33§ 5.69±1.14§ 6.05±0.66*§ 53±15§
CHF 54±13 0.77±0.04§ 30±35§ 6.86±0.72 7.89±1.72*§ 66±30§
RAP 58±13 0.74±0.04 12±13 7.08±0.91 8.76±1.26* 26±10
Meth 48±11 0.75±0.05 19±25 6.69±1.12 7.25±1.23§ 41±20§
ANOVA P = 0.01 P<0.0001 P<0.0001 P<0.0001 P<0.0001
*

p<0.01 in paired t-test between Endo and Epi DFs

p<0.05 vs Control

§

p<0.05 vs RAP