Skip to main content
. 2010 Mar 9;102(6):987–994. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605595

Table 1. Baseline characteristics of patients included in the pharmacogenomic analysis.

    Clinical response
  TTP   OS  
Variables n (%) Responder (CR+PR+SD>6 months) Non-responder (SD <6 months) P a Median (95% CI) P b Median (95% CI) P b
Age (years; range) 58 (37–75) n (%) n (%)          
 <60 35 (56.5) 25 (71) 10 (29) 0.55 12 (8.1–15.8) 0.69 29 (14.5–43.6) 0.79
 ⩾60 27 (43.5) 20 (80) 5 (20)   12 (10.9–13.2)   24 (21–27)  
                 
Gender                
 Male 45 (75) 33 (73) 12 (27) 0.74 12 (10.9–13.2) 0.9 27 (17.6–36) 0.38
 Female 15 (25) 12 (80) 3 (20)   9.8 (3.3–16.4)   24 (7.3–41.5)  
                 
ECOG performance status
 0–1 54 (90) 39 (72) 15 (28) 0.26 12 (10.4–13.5) 0.79 27 (17.2–36.7) 0.31
 2 6 (10) 6 (100)   12 (8.7–15)   15 (0.0–34.3)  
                 
Köhne risk classification
 Low 26 (43) 22 (85) 4 (15) 0.04 15 (8.7–21.2) 0.001 35.7 (—) 0.001
 Intermediate 28 (47) 21 (75) 7 (25)   11 (7.7–14.9)   24 (18.5–29.1)  
 High 6 (10) 2 (33) 4 (67)   3 (1.3–5.1)   5 (3–6.8)  
                 
Primary tumour site
 Colon 41 (68) 28 (68) 13 (32) 0.11 12 (9.2–14.6) 0.33 24 (21.3–27.4) 0.09
 Rectum 19 (31) 17 (89) 2 (11)   13 (10.5–15.4)   43 (25.1–61.4)  
 Previous radiotherapy 6 (10) 5 (83) 1 (17) 1 8 (5.3–9.8) 0.23 18 (16.1–29.6) 0.9
 Previous adjuvant chemotherapy 12 (20) 10 (83) 2 (17) 0.71 9.8 (4.6–15.1) 0.31 19 (9.1–29.5) 0.9
                 
Consolidation                
 Yes 28 (48) 17 (12.2–21.4) 0.001 56 (32.9–79) 0.001
 No 30 (52)   7 (5.8–7.6)   14 (5.1–22.7)  
 Dose reduction 16 (27) 11 (69) 5 (31) 0.51 12 (4.8–19.2) 0.46 24 (12.7–35.8) 0.31
 Dose delay 21 (35) 14 (67) 7 (33) 0.35 9.8 (2.2–17.4) 0.15 18 (4.8–31.9) 0.21

Abbreviations: CI=confidence interval; CR=complete response; ECOG=Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; OS=overall survival; PR=partial remission; SD=stable disease.

a

Clinical response calculated from χ2-test. Kaplan–Meier estimates of TTP and OS.

b

Difference of the estimates tested using the log-rank test.