Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Thorac Surg. 2009 Aug;88(2):558–564. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.03.085

Table 1.

Comparison of Impaired Ventricular Function versus Preserved Ventricular Function with heart failure

Characteristic Impaired Ventricular Function (n=18) Preserved Ventricular Function (n=16) p*
Age at Evaluation, yrs mean ± SD (range) 12.8 ± 5.9 (2.3–19.9) 10.9 ± 6.0 (4.6–26.1) *
Time since Fontan, yrs mean ± SD (range) 8.8 ± 5.2 (0.2–16.9) 6.1 ± 6.2 (0.2–24.8) *
Male sex, n (%) 12 (66.7%) 9 (56.3%) *
Congenital heart defect n, (%) *
 TA 4 (22.2%) 2 (12.5%)
 DORV 5 (27.8%) 7 (43.75%)
 HLHS 6 (33.4%) 5 (31.3%)
 DILV - 2 (12.5%)
 Other 3 (16.7%) -
Fontan Surgery, n (%) *
 Lateral Tunnel 15 (83.3%) 11 (68.8%)
 Atriopulmonary 2 (11.1%) 3 (18.8%)
 Extracardiac conduit 1 (5.6%) 2 (12.5%)
Systemic Ventricle
 Right, n (%) 12 (66.7%) 12 (75.0%) *
AV valve regurgitation, n (%)
 Moderate to Severe 10 (55.6%) 1 (6.3%) .006
Pacemaker, n (%) 5 (27.8%) 6 (37.5%) *
Plastic Bronchitis, n (%) 0 5 (31.3%) .016
PLE, n (%) 0 9 (56.3%) <.001

AV valve, atrioventricular valve; DILV, double inlet left ventricle; DORV, double outlet right ventricle; HLHS, hypoplastic left heart syndrome; PLE, protein-losing enteropathy; TA, tricuspid atresia;