Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Pain Symptom Manage. 2010 Mar;39(3):486–501. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2009.08.007

Table 5.

Select Item and Subscale Scores from the Piper Fatigue Scale a

Scale Usual Care n=69 Mean (SD) Intervention n=98 Mean (SD) Group by Time Interaction P-value
Baseline 1 month 3 months Baseline 1 month 3 months
Piper Fatigue Scale (PFS) Items (0-10)
Fatigue interfered with work 6.2 (3.2) 5.9 (3.4) 5.0 (3.1) 5.8 (3.2) 5.0 (2.8) 4.0 (3.0)
Fatigue interfered with enjoyable activities 7.0 (2.8) 6.3 (3.2) 6.0 (3.2) 6.7 (2.8) 5.8 (2.9) 5.0 (3.0)
Intensity of fatigue 6.3 (2.6) 5.8 (3.1) 5.1 (2.6) 5.4 (2.3) 4.9 (2.2) 4.2 (2.3)
Fatigue was unpleasant 6.4 (2.5) 6.2 (2.8) 5.5 (2.7) 6.2 (2.7) 5.9 (2.5) 5.1 (2.4)
Fatigue was disagreeable 6.4 (2.6) 6.2 (2.8) 5.6 (2.7) 6.0 (2.9) 5.6 (2.6) 5.1 (2.4)
Fatigue had negative effect 6.1 (2.6) 6.0 (2.7) 5.2 (2.6) 6.4 (2.8) 5.9 (2.5) 5.2 (2.5)
Fatigue made me feel weak 6.3 (2.6) 6.2 (2.6) 5.5 (2.8) 6.8 (2.5) 5.7 (2.8) 4.2 (3.0)
Fatigue made me feel listless 6.1 (2.6) 6.2 (2.4) 5.7 (2.7) 5.9 (2.3) 5.1 (2.3) 4.3 (2.5)
Fatigue made me feel tired 6.9 (2.4) 6.9 (2.5) 5.8 (2.9) 7.0 (2.5) 6.3 (2.7) 5.1 (2.8)
Fatigue made me feel unenergetic 7.2 (2.3) 7.0 (2.5) 5.8 (2.8) 7.0 (2.3) 6.0 (2.4) 5.1 (2.6)
Fatigue was emotionally distressing 6.6 (2.6) 6.5 (2.9) 5.3 (2.7) 6.2 (2.5) 5.6 (2.3) 4.8 (2.7)
PFS Subscale Scores
Sensory 6.4 (2.2) 6.2 (2.3) 5.5 (2.8) 6.4 (2.1) 5.4 (2.3) 4.4 (2.5) .025
Affective Meaning 6.0 (2.4) 5.7 (2.5) 5.4 (2.6) 5.8 (2.4) 5.2 (2.2) 4.7 (2.2) .696
Cognitive/Mood 4.9 (2.0) 4.9 (2.2) 4.6 (2.1) 5.1 (2.2) 4.5 (2.0) 3.9 (2.1) .070
Behavioral Severity 6.0 (2.6) 5.7 (3.0) 5.5 (3.1) 5.8 (2.5) 5.1 (2.5) 4.2 (2.5) .080
Total Score 5.8 (2.0) 5.6 (2.3) 5.3 (2.4) 5.7 (2.0) 5.0 (2.0) 4.3 (2.1) .053
a

Patients with fatigue only (intensity ≥4.0) or fatigue and pain (intensity ≥4.0) were included in this analysis.