Table 1. Results of fitting logistic regression models to the data of least weasel predation.
Explanatory variable | Coefficient | P-value for H0: | Odds Ratio *) | 95% CI for †) |
Difference between E- and E+ voles in the number of belt crossings per hour ( = activityE− − activityE+) | 0.01 | 0.25 | 1.01 | 0.99–1.04 |
Sex of vole | −0.60 | 0.65 | 0.55 | 0.00–6.04 |
Length of the feeding period (days) | 0.14 | 0.19 | 1.15 | 0.95–1.40 |
Difference between E− and E+ voles in weight ( = weightE− − weightE+) | 0.12 | 0.81 | 1.13 | 0.42–3.22 |
*)The estimated odds ratio For quantitative explanatory variables indicates the percent change in the odds of E+ vole being captured for each 1-unit increase in the explanatory variable. For example, for every one day increase in the length of the feeding period, the odds of E+ vole being captured increases by 15%. For categorical variable sex the of 0.55 implies that for females the odds of E+ vole being captured is 0.55 times the odds for males, i.e. 45% lower.
†)The 95% confidence interval for the indicates the range of values within which the odds ratio from 95 of 100 similar studies would be expected to fall. The 95% CI also indicates the precision of the estimated .