Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Pediatr Clin North Am. 2010 Feb;57(1):83–96. doi: 10.1016/j.pcl.2009.11.002

Table 2.

Current approaches to tumor vaccination

APPROACH ANTIGEN RESTRICTIONS PROS CONS
Peptide vaccines 9–20 amino acids HLA allele specific (e.g. HLA-A2) Non-toxic, cheap to produce Restricted to patients with one specific HLA alleles, targets only one epitope, requires adjuvant
Protein Whole antigens None No restrictions based upon HLA type Expensive to produce, unclear how best to administer
Pox Viruses Whole antigens Some concern in immuno-suppressed hosts Can also administer costimulator y molecules Anti-pox immune response limits repetitive administration
DNA Whole antigens None Relatively simple to produce May be better at boosting existing immune responses than inducing primary responses
Dendritic cells Peptides or protein antigens or whole tumor cells Requires harvest, not off-the-shelf Individualize herapy, can iver multiple igens Labor intensive, unclear how best to prepare DCs
Genetically engineered tumor cell banks All antigens expressed by the tumor will be presented None Presentation of multiple antigens, can specifically modulate co-stimulation Individual cell banks difficult to produce, allogeneic cells banks may or may not be as effective