Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychol Med. 2009 Apr 29;39(12):1967–1978. doi: 10.1017/S0033291709005807

Table 2.

Confirmatory factor analysis results testing for the unidimensionality of the nine Axis II borderline personality disorder diagnostic criteria

Total sample (n=2794)
Females (n=1772)
Males (n=1022)
Loadings S.E. Res Loadings S.E. Res Loadings S.E. Res
BPD-1 0.65 0.03 0.58 0.62 004 0.62 0.72 005 0.48
BPD-2 0.76 0.02 0.42 0.79 002 0.38 0.68 004 0.54
BPD-3 0.71 0.04 0.50 0.70 005 0.51 0.71 009 0.49
BPD-4 0.48 0.03 0.77 0.53 004 0.71 0.56 004 0.69
BPD-5 0.70 0.03 0.51 0.73 004 0.47 0.66 006 0.58
BPD-6 0.79 0.02 0.38 0.83 002 0.32 0.66 004 0.55
BPD-7 0.67 0.03 0.55 0.70 003 0.51 0.55 006 0.70
BPD-8 0.64 0.03 0.59 0.64 003 0.59 0.65 004 0.58
BPD-9 0.67 0.03 0.55 0.69 004 0.53 0.66 006 0.56
Null 1898.9 (13) 1578.9 (13) 489.5 (13)
χ 2 118.3 (23) 97.5 (21) 64.7 (21)
CFI 0.95 0.95 0.91
TLI 0.97 0.97 0.94
RMSEA 0.04 0.05 0.05

BPD, Borderline personality disorder; CFI, comparative fit index; TLI, Tucker—Lewis index; RMSEA, root mean square error of approximation; Loadings, factor loading estimates; S.E., factor loading standard error; Res, criterion residual variance; Null, chi-square fit for uncorrelated baseline model; χ2, chi-square fit for single-factor model.

Degrees of freedom are given in parentheses. For the weighted least squares means and variance adjusted (WLSMV) estimator, degrees of freedom are estimated and data dependent.