Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel. 2010 Mar;13(2):203–213.

Table 1.

Selected gene therapy vectors for site-specific delivery of transgenes.

Vector Cardiovascular pathology Gene Delivery system Advantages Disadvantages Reference
Plasmid DNA In-stent restenosis VEGF Stent coating Non-toxic, ease of production and low immunogenicity Low level and transient expression [11]
Antisense RNA In-stent restenosis cMYC Catheter Non-toxic, ease of production and low immunogenicity Low efficacy of inhibition and non-specific effects [24]
RNAi Restenosis HIF1α Perivascular delivery Non-toxic with profound gene inhibition Non-specific effects [26]
Adenovirus (first generation) In-stent restenosis iNOS Polyallylamine bisphosphonate- modified stent High levels of expression Limited duration of expression, immune response against the vector and inflammation [12]
Helper-dependent adenovirus Restenosis uPA Intralumenal delivery Prolonged expression and large capacity of transgene cassette Low yield of vector and time-consuming production process [34]
Adeno-associated virus Myocardial infarction TGFβ Direct myocardial injection Prolonged expression and stable genomic integration Small capacity of transgene cassette [39]
Retrovirus Restenosis β-Gal Intralumenal delivery Life-long expression Random genome integration and a risk of oncogenesis [28]
Lentivirus Heart transplantation GFP Direct injection Transduction of quiescent cells Low production titers, random genome integration and a risk of oncogenesis [29]