Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Virol Methods. 2009 Dec 29;165(1):36–41. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2009.12.014

Table 2.

Table 2A Comparison of gene gun and pipette infections of H. CRPV and H. CRPV E8ko in rabbits. Each of ten rabbits was infected as follows: L(left side)1, L3: E8ko via gene gun; L2, L4, H. CRPV via gene gun; R(right side)1, R3, E8ko via pipette; R2, R4, H. CRPV via pipette. Sites L1, R1 and L2, R2 received no scarification prior to infection. Sites L3, R3 an L4, R4 were scarified three days prior to infection.
Infections by
gene gun
DNA Infections by pipette
delivery
DNA Scarification at
day -3?
L1 E8M R1 E8M No
L2 wt.H. R2 wt. H. No
CRPV CRPV
L3 E8 M R3 E8M Yes
L4 wt. H. R4 wt. H. Yes
CRPV CRPV
Table 2B Positive papilloma sites at week 11 following infection on rabbits infected with H. CRPV and the E8ko as shown in table 1A. Note that all animals experienced the gene gun although only half of the infections were initiated by gene gun.
Gene gun
Delivery Site
Scarification?
Genome Paps/ total
infection sites
Week 11
Pipette
Delivery Site
Scarification?
Genome Paps/ total
infection sites
Week 11
L1 no E8M 1/10 R1 no E8M 2/10
L2 no W.T. 1/10 R2 no W.T. 4/10
L3 yes E8M 1/10 R3 yes E8M 2/10
L4 yes W.T. 5/10 R4 yes W.T. 8/10