Skip to main content
. 2010 Mar 26;6(3):e1000723. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000723

Table 3. Simulation time comparison between detailed and abstracted models.

Simulation timea (hours)
Wild-type fimB knock-outd fimB overexpressede
Model Partialb Allc Partial All Partial All
Detailed 28.5 N/A 17.1 N/A 28.8 N/A
Abstracted 1.5 2.85 0.67 1.17 2.38 4.57

aComputational time for 100,000 stochastic simulation runs as well as model abstraction when applicable for each temperature point on a single PC.

bTemperature points at Inline graphic, Inline graphic, and Inline graphic.

cTemperature points at Inline graphic, Inline graphic, Inline graphic, Inline graphic, Inline graphic, Inline graphic, Inline graphic, Inline graphic, Inline graphic, and Inline graphic.

dSystem with no ON-to-OFF Inline graphic activity.

e Inline graphic overproduction by a factor of 2 compared to wild-type.