Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Mar 28.
Published in final edited form as: Mol Cancer Ther. 2009 Mar 10;8(3):692–702. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-08-0769

Table 1. In vivo LV injection: effect on lymph node dendritic cell subset numbers and enGFP expression.

Dendritic cell subset* Cohort Total dendritic cell number per lymph node
enGFP+ dendritic cell number per lymph node
n Statistics n Statistics
Myeloid [A] LV, ipsilateral 2.3 × 103 ± 0.4 A vs C, P = 0.008 11 ± 3 A vs C, P = 0.01
[B] LV, contralateral 1.5 × 103 ± 0.6 B vs C, P = 0.08 19 ± 3 B vs C, P = 0.20
[C] control 0.4 × 103 ± 0.1 1 ± 1
Plasmacytoid [A] LV, ipsilateral 2.0 × 103 ± 0.6 A vs C, P = 0.05 3 ± 1 A vs C, P = 0.04
[B] LV, contralateral 1.2 × 103 ± 0.3 B vs C, P = 0.20 4 ± 1 B vs C, P = 0.02
[C] control 0.6 × 103 ± 0.1 1 ± 1
Lymphoid [A] LV, ipsilateral 8.3 × 102 ± 3.0 A vs C, P = 0.10 BDL
[B] LV, contralateral 6.2 × 102 ± 2.3 B vs C, P = 0.20 BDL
[C] control 3.2 × 102 ± 0.4 BDL
*

On day 3 after footpad injection of LV-enGFP, one ipsilateral and one contralateral inguinal lymph node was harvested from each mouse and controls. Total dendritic cells (DCs) and enGFP+ dendritic cells per lymph node were enumerated by flow cytometry. The following panels were used to identify DC subsets: myeloid, CD11c+, CD11b-B220-; plasmacytoid, CD11c+, B220+, Gr-1+; and lymphoid, CD11c+, CD11b-, B220-, CD8+.

Fourteen mice were injected with LV-enGFP; lymph nodes in each group were pooled from n = 2-3 mice, thereby giving overall n =5. n = 5 controls were also evaluated. Cell events analyzed ranged from 5.1 × 105 to 8.7 × 105 ipsilaterally, from 1.6 × 105 to 6.2 × 105 contralaterally, and 1 × 105 in controls.

Absolute numbers of cells per lymph node were calculated from flow and absolute count data. Mean ± SE. P values were determined by two-sided Student's t test. BDL, below detection limit (no events recorded).