Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Feb 15.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroimage. 2009 Nov 10;49(4):3463–3473. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.11.004

Table 2.

Effects of Age and Accuracy on Interference-processing for Youth

Linear Model Coefficients ± S.E. (p-value)

ROI
Youth
Adult
Group
AgexGroup
Accuracy
Interference RT
pMFC .05 ± .02* .001 ± .006 .55 ± .39 .04 ± .02* −.48 ± .60 .00 +/− .00
R. IFG .03 ± .01 .000 ± .004 .34 ± .28 −.03 ± .02 −.29 ± .43 .00 +/− .00
L. IFG .04 ± .02* .001 ± .005 .52 ± .34 .04 ± .02* −.40 ± .53 .00 +/− .00
R. Ins .03 ± .02* −.003 ± .005 .60 ± .30* .03 ± .02* −.60 ± .46 .00 +/− .00
L. Ins .02 ± .01 .001 ± .004 .33 ± .24 −.02 ± .01 .79 ± .37* .00 +/− .00
B. Par .02 +/− .01 −.002 +/− .003 .28 +/− .22 −.02 +/− . −1 .45 +/− .34 .00 +/− .00
*

p < .05

Δ Estimate: Δ Age for Youth and Adults

Signs for each value are in reference to youth [same value, but invert signs for adults]