Skip to main content
. 2010 Jan 20;39(2):450–458. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyp374

Table 3.

Recall at the home visit following documented clinic visits at Lwak Hospitala

n (%) reporting a clinic visit to Lwak in past 2 weeks
n (%) reporting receiving antimalarialsb in the past 2 weeks
n (%) reporting receiving an antibioticb in the past 2 weeks
Day after clinic visit that home visited Children <5 yearsc of age Persons ≥5 yearsc of age Children <5 yearsc of age Persons ≥5 yearsc of age Children <5 yearsc of age Persons ≥5 yearsc of age
0d 56 (35) 310 (49) 11 (12) 21 (9) 15 (27) 49 (16)
1 139 (94) 531 (96) 59 (77) 129 (69) 35 (65) 132 (52)
2 137 (98) 440 (96) 61 (86) 120 (76) 35 (65) 137 (56)
3 152 (99) 449 (96) 73 (84) 122 (73) 46 (71) 124 (54)
4 125 (96) 433 (96) 74 (85) 110 (71) 36 (71) 107 (49)
5 142 (97) 424 (94) 59 (83) 102 (65) 35 (64) 99 (45)
6 156 (96) 490 (94) 81 (83) 137 (64) 43 (67) 142 (52)
7 170 (98) 561 (94) 78 (74) 169 (66) 48 (74) 168 (55)
8 130 (94) 432 (93) 76 (87) 113 (60) 32 (55) 117 (54)
9 112 (91) 359 (90) 71 (85) 97 (52) 27 (51) 94 (43)
10 142 (89) 374 (89) 78 (77) 104 (56) 34 (48) 98 (39)
11 100 (86) 309 (87) 56 (68) 76 (51) 25 (42) 79 (38)
12 101 (84) 298 (87) 58 (64) 77 (50) 25 (45) 80 (37)
13 137 (86) 441 (84) 68 (51) 125 (50) 25 (42) 114 (35)

aClinic visitation, antimalarial, and antibiotic use based on the day after documented clinic visit at Lwak Hospital that the home visit was made, Asembo, rural western Kenya. Data from 1 July 2006 to 30 June 2007.

bFor anti-malarial and antibiotic recall, only those individuals with a known prescription given at Lwak hospital were included in the denominator.

cFor all six columns, the linear test for trend had a P-value <0.0001 for a decrease in recall from days 1–13; day 0 was excluded (see ‘Methods’ section).

dDay 0 is when the home visit is on the same day as the clinic visit.