Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer. 2010 Feb 1;116(3):659–669. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24831

TABLE 5.

TABLE 5A. Relationship between Tumor Grade and Tumor Status (N=85)*

Differentiation
No. of Patients (%)

Tumor Status Well Moderate Poor Total
pT1 25 (43.9) 4 (19.0) 2 (28.6) 31 (36.5)
pT2 25 (43.9) 13 (61.9) 3 (42.9) 41 (48.2)
pT3 0 (0) 1 (4.8) 2 (28.6) 3 (3.5)
pT4 7(12.3) 3 (14.3) 0 (0) 10 (11.8)
Total 57 (100) 21 (100) 7 (100) 85 (100)
Table 5B. Relationship between Tumor Grade and Node Status (N=76)*

Differentiation
No. of Patients (%)

Node Status Well Moderate Poor Total

Negative 37 (75.5) 13 (65.0) 4 (57.1) 54 (71.1)
Positive 12 (24.5) 7 (35.0) 3 (42.9) 22 (29.0)
Total 49 (100) 20 (100) 7 (100) 76 (100)
*

P=0.004 (Chi-Square test) for comparison of tumor grade and tumor status.

*

P=0.48 (Chi-Square test) for comparison of tumor grade and tumor status.

76 patients had surgically resected lymph nodes.