TABLE 5.
TABLE 5A. Relationship between Tumor Grade and Tumor Status (N=85)* | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Differentiation No. of Patients (%) |
||||
Tumor Status | Well | Moderate | Poor | Total |
pT1 | 25 (43.9) | 4 (19.0) | 2 (28.6) | 31 (36.5) |
pT2 | 25 (43.9) | 13 (61.9) | 3 (42.9) | 41 (48.2) |
pT3 | 0 (0) | 1 (4.8) | 2 (28.6) | 3 (3.5) |
pT4 | 7(12.3) | 3 (14.3) | 0 (0) | 10 (11.8) |
Total | 57 (100) | 21 (100) | 7 (100) | 85 (100) |
Table 5B. Relationship between Tumor Grade and Node Status (N=76)* | ||||
Differentiation No. of Patients (%) |
||||
Node Status† | Well | Moderate | Poor | Total |
Negative | 37 (75.5) | 13 (65.0) | 4 (57.1) | 54 (71.1) |
Positive | 12 (24.5) | 7 (35.0) | 3 (42.9) | 22 (29.0) |
Total | 49 (100) | 20 (100) | 7 (100) | 76 (100) |
P=0.004 (Chi-Square test) for comparison of tumor grade and tumor status.
P=0.48 (Chi-Square test) for comparison of tumor grade and tumor status.
76 patients had surgically resected lymph nodes.