Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Nat Neurosci. 2010 Mar 7;13(4):507–512. doi: 10.1038/nn.2509

Table 2.

Average Anatomical Location and Statistical Assessment of Activation for the individually-defined ROIs from Search trials in Experiment 1 (open contrast SPM).

Region Hemi Tal co-ords (x, y, z) ± SD SS1+2 vs. Search (t) SS3+4 vs. Search (t) SS5+6 vs. Search (t)
IPS Right 26 ± 4, −65 ± 6, 36 ± 5 2.81* 0.46 0.28
IPS Left −22 ± 4, −66 ± 6, 39 ± 6 3.45* 0.44 1.38
FEF Right 34 ± 4, −7 ± 3, 51 ± 5 1.79 0.51 0.63
FEF Left −32 ± 5, −8 ± 3, 51 ± 5 2.50* 1.95 0.96
TPJ Right 47 ± 5, −55 ± 5, 28 ± 5 4.52* 3.21* 1.65
TPJ Left −49 ± 2, −58 ± 5, 24 ± 4 5.33* 2.37* 1.73
IFJ Right 40 ± 4, 6 ± 3, 27 ± 3 4.99* 1.67 1.06
IFJ Left −42 ± 3, 8 ± 3, 25 ± 2 5.92* 2.51* 1.12

The three rightmost columns list the t-values resulting from paired t-tests of the given Surprise Stimulus pairs versus Target Only activity. See Table 1 for abbreviation key. An asterisk (*) marks those comparisons that are significant at p < 0.05. These ROI coordinates closely matched those isolated from the Surprise trials (see Table 1).