. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Mar 30.

Published in final edited form as: J Clin Psychol. 2009 Sep;65(9):925–941. doi: 10.1002/jclp.20596

Table 2.

Recovery from Criticism: Effects of Diagnosis on Profile of Mood States (POMS) Negative Affect at Baseline and Immediately After the Criticism for Participants who Reacted to the Criticism

Fixed effect	Coefficient	SE	t	p Value
Intercept (π_i0)—Level 1
Intercept (β₀₀)—Level 2	0.72	0.14	5.12	0.00
Diagnosis (β₀₁)—Level 2	0.77	0.26	2.93	0.01
Reactivity slope (π_i1)—Level 1
Intercept (β₁₀)—Level 2	0.35	0.08	4.50	0.00
Diagnosis (β₁₁)—Level 2	0.33	0.16	2.07	0.04
Recovery slope (π_i2)—Level 1
Intercept (β₂₀)—Level	−0.08	0.20	−0.42	0.68
Diagnosis (β₂₁)—Level 2	0.80	0.37	− 2.16	0.04

Note. These results only include participants who reacted to the criticism (i.e., had some initial increase in negative affect). The parameter for the line in bold reflects how a person's diagnosis influences their recovery after they reacted to the criticism.