Skip to main content
. 2010 Mar 31;5(3):e9883. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009883

Table 3. Ensemble genealogical sorting indices (gsiT) for the combined set of majority-rule consensus trees from all four nuclear loci and for the Bayesian posterior distributions of each individual nuclear locus.

Lineage All loci gsiT adora3 gsiT (min-max) eno gsiT (min-max) fib gsiT (min-max) vwf gsiT (min-max)
M. berthae 0.158 0.185 (0.141–0.269) 0.573 (0.377–0.843) 0.259 (0.207–0.343) 0.303 (0.222–0.412)
M. griseorufus 0.487 0.414 (0.257–0.519) 0.729 (0.683–0.814) 0.673 (0.664–0.717) 0.48 (0.359–0.576)
M. lehilahytsara 0.069 0.119 (0.074–0.187)a 0.243 (0.155–0.529) 0.407 (0.27–0.538) 0.226 (0.149–0.344)
M. mittermeieri 0.142 0.141 (0.103–0.211) 0.384 (0.255–0.643) 0.361 (0.179–0.639) 0.512 (0.304–0.739)
M. murinus (Bemanasy) 0.157 0.224 (0.153–0.327) 0.204 (0.168–0.247) 0.2 (0.141–0.28) 0.323 (0.246–0.487)
M. murinus (Mandena) 0.357 0.314 (0.255–0.377) 0.768 (0.765–0.862) 0.323 (0.246–0.45) 0.474 (0.4–0.571)
M. murinus (remaining pops) 0.406 0.469 (0.395–0.571) 0.892 (0.842–0.926) 0.36 (0.279–0.506) 0.45 (0.317–0.57)
M. myoxinus 0.416 0.341 (0.311–0.392) 0.522 (0.441–0.631) 0.429 (0.368–0.489) 0.736 (0.672–0.793)
M. ravelobensis 1.0 1.0 (0.956–1.0) 1.0 (1.0–1.0) 0.995 (0.727–1.0) 1.0 (1.0–1.0)
M. rufus 0.326 0.302 (0.25–0.357) 0.533 (0.45–0.67) 0.431 (0.369–0.5) 0.7 (0.62–0.829)
M. sambiranensis 0.491 0.913 (0.334–1.0) 0.407 (0.293–0.605) 0.344 (0.203–0.465) 0.756 (0.559–0.935)
M. simmonsi 1.0 1.0 (0.981–1.0) 1.0 (1.0–1.0) 1.0 (1.0–1.0) 0.999 (0.944–1.0)
M. tavaratra 0.724 0.981 (0.495–1.0) 1.0 (1.0–1.0) 0.359 (0.194–0.511) 0.895 (0.761–1.0)
Microcebus sp. (Ambanja/Montagne d'Ambre) 0.270 0.259 (0.126–0.538) 0.892 (0.725–1.0) 0.516 (0.296–0.78) 0.383 (0.183–0.536)
Microcebus sp. (Ivorona/Manantantely) 0.478 0.141 (0.125–0.23) 0.669 (0.589–0.8) 1.0 (1.0–1.0) 0.383 (0.187–0.566)
Microcebus sp. (Marolambo) 0.713 0.097 (0.062–0.183)a 1.0 (1.0–1.0) 0.966 (0.831–1.0) 0.861 (0.71–1.0)
a

>5 of the 100 trees sampled from the Bayesian posterior distribution had gsi values with p>0.05.

b

Microcebus rufus is not diagnosed as a diverging lineage according to the criteria used in this study, but is included here based on patterns of population differentiation from M. berthae and M. myoxinus and due to its delimitation based on morphological and ecological traits [37].

The minimum and maximum gsi for individual trees within the Bayesian posterior distributions are given in parentheses.