Table 1.
Identification of RTP in two-dimensional gel spots by PMF analysis
| Spota | Protein | MOWSE(PMF)b | Matchedpeptide | Matched peptidecoverage (%) | Sequencecoverage (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| α (DA) | Retinophilin | 141 | 8 | 73 | 51 |
| β (DA) | Retinophilin | 146 | 8 | 80 | 51 |
| β (LA) | Retinophilin | 141 | 8 | 73 | 51 |
| γ (DA) | Retinophilin | 111 | 7 | 64 | 41 |
| γ (LA) | Retinophilin | 111 | 7 | 64 | 41 |
| δ (LA) | Retinophilin | 161 | 9 | 75 | 60 |
| ϵ (LA) | Retinophilin | 146 | 8 | 80 | 51 |
| β (23 kDa) | Retinophilin | 127 | 7 | 88 | 41 |
aSpot IDs corresponding to those shown in Figure 1.
bMASCOT PMF score >60 corresponding to p < 0.05.