Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Nat Genet. 2009 Nov 13;42(1):30–35. doi: 10.1038/ng.499

Table 3. Number of candidate genes identified based on different filtering strategies.

Under the dominant model, at least one non-synonymous variant, splice acceptor or donor site variant or coding indel (NS/SS/I) in a gene was required in the gene. Under the recessive model, at least two novel variants were required, and these could be either at the same position (i.e. a homozygous variant) or at two different positions in the same gene (i.e. a potential compound heterozygote, though we were unable to ascertain phase at this stage). In each column is the range for the number of candidate genes for exomes considered individually (column 1) and all combinations of 2 to 4 exomes (columns 2-4). Note that the upper bound on the ranges may be inflated relative to what would be the case if four unrelated, affected individuals had been used because the comparisons in which the two siblings were included provided reduced power compared to unrelated individuals. Columns 5-9 show the number of candidate genes when at least 1, 2, or 3 individuals is required to have one variant in a gene (dominant model) or two or more variants in a gene (recessive model). This is a simple model of genetic heterogeneity or incomplete data. For example, the total number of candidate genes common to any 3 of all 4 exomes is shown in column 9. For columns 5-6, one of the siblings (Kindred 1-B) was not included in the analysis as sibs share 50% of variants.

Dominant Model Number of Affected Exomes Subsets of 3 Exomes Subsets of all 4 Exomes

1 2 3 Any 1 Any 2 Any 1 Any 2 Any 3

NS/SS/I 4645-4687 3358-3940 2850-3099 6658 4489 6943 5167 3920
… not in dbSNP129 634-695 136-369 72-105 1617 274 1829 553 172
… not in HapMap 8 898-979 161-506 55-117 2336 409 2628 835 222
… not in either 453-528 40-228 10-26 1317 109 1516 333 44
… AND predicted damaging 204-284 10-83 3-6 682 37 787 126 11

Recessive Model Number of Affected Exomes Subsets of 3 Exomes Subsets of all 4 Exomes

1 2 3 Any 1 Any 2 Any 1 Any 2 Any 3

NS/SS/I 2780-2863 1993-2362 1646-1810 4097 2713 4293 3172 2329
… not in dbSNP129 92-115 30-53 22-31 226 61 270 90 42
… not in HapMap 8 111-133 13-46 5-13 329 32 397 75 19
… not in either 31-45 2-9 2-3 100 6 121 14 4
… AND predicted damaging 6-16 0-2 0-1 35 2 44 4 1