Table 1.
mtDNA | microsatellites | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Population | n | π | nh | h | FS | n | A | AR | HO | HE | FIS | ||
Aowanda | AW | South | 3 | 0.00260 | 3 | 1.00 | -0.34 | 4 | 4.00 | 4.29 | 0.86 | 0.73 | -0.171 |
Beidongyanshan | BS | North | 9 | 0.00184 | 4 | 0.69 | 0.27 | 11 | 5.43 | 4.00 | 0.80 | 0.72 | -0.121 |
Bilu | BL | North | 7 | 0.00446 | 7 | 1.00 | -3.23* | 11 | 6.14 | 4.42 | 0.70 | 0.80 | 0.119 |
Chilan | CL | North | 3 | 0.00195 | 3 | 1.00 | -0.69 | 5 | 4.00 | 4.10 | 0.80 | 0.75 | -0.062 |
Chitou | CT | South | 9 | 0.00309 | 5 | 0.81 | 0.17 | 9 | 5.43 | 4.48 | 0.74 | 0.80 | 0.073 |
Danda | DD | South | 9 | 0.00309 | 6 | 0.92 | -1.03 | 12 | 6.29 | 4.26 | 0.72 | 0.77 | 0.060 |
Guanwu | GW | North | 9 | 0.00271 | 6 | 0.89 | -1.35 | 11 | 6.00 | 4.48 | 0.67 | 0.79 | 0.149 |
Liyuan | LI | South | 10 | 0.00143 | 5 | 0.76 | -1.32 | 13 | 7.57 | 4.81 | 0.84 | 0.82 | -0.034 |
Mingchi | MC | North | 7 | 0.00912 | 6 | 0.95 | -2.20* | 10 | 5.43 | 4.47 | 0.85 | 0.80 | -0.070 |
Meifeng | MF | North | 10 | 0.00236 | 7 | 0.87 | -2.67* | 10 | 6.71 | 4.80 | 0.81 | 0.83 | 0.015 |
Moshan | MS | South | 8 | 0.00164 | 5 | 0.79 | -1.54 | 9 | 5.43 | 4.42 | 0.75 | 0.79 | 0.050 |
Nanxi | NX | South | 1 | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | 7 | 5.14 | 4.39 | 0.60 | 0.80 | 0.245 |
Taipingshan | TP | North | 6 | 0.00286 | 5 | 0.93 | -1.33 | 10 | 6.57 | 4.65 | 0.74 | 0.81 | 0.087 |
Total | 91 | 0.00272 | 36 | 0.90 | -26.6** | 122 | 5.70 | 4.43 | 0.76 | 0.79 | 0.026 |
The summary of genetic diversity includes sample size (n) nucleotide diversity (π), number of haplotypes (nh), haplotype diversity (h), Fu's FS (FS), average number of alleles per locus (A), allelic richness (AR), observed heterozygosity (HO), expected heterozygosity (HE), and inbreeding coefficient (FIS). Microsatellite statistics are based on the average of seven polymorphic loci.
* P < 0.05; ** P < 0.001