Skip to main content
. 2010 Feb 25;11:139. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-11-139

Table 4.

Correlation coefficients between the five methods in three marker selection sets in the Vis Island dataset

MLH FPLINK FADC FEstimSPT FEstim
Full marker set MLH 1.00 -1.00 -1.00 -0.67 *
FPLINK -1.00 1.00 0.99 0.67 *
FADC -1.00 0.99 1.00 0.66 *
FEstimSPT -0.67 0.67 0.66 1.00 *
FEstim * * * * *
M0.1 MLH 1.00 -1.00 -0.99 -0.71 -0.54
FPLINK -1.00 1.00 0.99 0.74 0.60
FADC -0.99 0.99 1.00 0.78 0.63
FEstimSPT -0.71 0.74 0.78 1.00 0.55
FEstim -0.54 0.60 0.63 0.55 1.00
M0.05 MLH 1.00 -1.00 -0.99 -0.73 -0.64
FPLINK -1.00 1.00 0.99 0.73 0.64
FADC -0.99 0.99 1.00 0.75 0.64
FEstimSPT -0.73 0.73 0.75 1.00 0.51
FEstim -0.64 0.64 0.64 0.51 1.00

All correlations were significant at the level of P < 0.001

All FPLINK and FADC values that were negative were set to zero in these correlations, in order to allow comparisons across different methods since FEstim does not provide negative values

*FEstim was not calculated for the full marker set due to LD

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure