Skip to main content
. 2009 Aug;11(8):1865–1882. doi: 10.1089/ars.2009.2462

Table 2.

Adverse Effects Reported in Controlled Clinical Trials of Bone Marrow-Derived Cell Therapy for Myocardial Repair

 
 
 
Cardiovascular death
In-stent restenosis or target vessel PCI
SVT
VT
Recurrent MI/angina
 
  Cell type Follow-up (months) T C T C T C T C T C Comments
A. Cells harvested from the bone marrow
ASTAMI (58, 59) BMMNC 12 0/50 0/50 11/50 9/50 NR NR 2/50 1/50 1/50 0/50 No difference in signal- averaged ECG variables
Hendrikx et al. (34) BMMNC 4 NR NR NA NA NR NR 6/9 (induced) 0/5 (induced) NR NR  
Karpov et al. (41) BMMNC 6 NR NR 4/22 3/22 NR NR NR NR 4/22 3/22 Incidence of arrhythmia was similar in both groups
Meluzin et al. (63, 64) BMMNC 12 NR NR 9/40 3/20 NR NR NR NR 1/40 2/20  
Mocini et al. (67) BMMNC 12 0/18 0/18 NA NA 8/18 6/18 6/18 9/18 NR NR Cardiac NMR scan did not reveal any abnormal tissue or calcification
Penicka et al. (76) BMMNC 4 2/17 0/10 24% 40% NR NR NR NR 1/17 NR Major adverse events in cell therapy group occurred prior to BMMNC injection
Perin et al. (77, 78) BMMNC 12 2/11 0/9 NA NA 0/11 0/9 0/11 0/9 NR NR No change in signal-averaged ECG parameters, BNP level, and WBC count
PROTECT-CAD (102) BMMNC 6 0/19 1/9 NA NA 0/19 0/9 0/19 0/9 0/19 2/9 Cardiac MRI did not reveal any tumor or calcification
REPAIR-AMI (25, 90, 91) BMMNC 12 2/101 5/103 16/101 26/103 NR NR 5/101 4/103 0/101 6/103 Combined cardiovascular events were significantly reduced in treated patients
Strauer et al. (97) BMMNC 3 NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR No side effects were observed at any point of time
Strauer et al. (98) BMMNC 3 NR NR 1/18 0/18 0/18 0/18 0/18 0/18 NR NR  
TCT-STAMI (29) BMMNC 6 0/10 0/10 NR NR 0/10 0/10 0/10 0/10 0/10 0/10  
TOPCARE-CHD (7) BMMNC
CPC
6 0/35 (BMC)
0/34 (CPC)
1/23 4/35 (BMC)
3/34 (CPC)
0/23 NR NR 0/35 (BMC)
1/34 (CPC)
1/23 0/35 (BMC)
2/34 (CPC)
0/23  
BOOST (66, 92, 106) BMC 18 0/30 1/30 5/30 4/30 0/30 0/30 1/30 1/30 1/30 0/30 Echocardiography did not reveal any tumor or calcification; no case of cancer was diagnosed during follow-up
Janssens et al. (37) BMC 4 NR NR 0/33 1/34 5/33 6/34 0/33 3/34 2/33 1/34 No late potential noted
Ruan et al. (87) BMC 6 NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR  
Bartunek et al. (10) AC133 + BMC 4 NR NR 9/19 4/16 NR NR 2/19 0/16 NR NR  
Chen et al. (17) MSC 6 NR NR NR NR 0/34 0/35 0/34 0/35 NR NR  
Chen et al. (16) MSC 12 2/24 4/24 NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR  
Katritsis et al. (42) MSC and EPC 4 NR NR NR NR 0/11 0/11 0/11 0/11 NR NR  
B. Mobilized progenitor cells
Choi et al. (18) PBSC 24 0/10 7/63 1/10 8/63 NR NR 0/10 0/63 0/10 4/63  
Erbs et al. (24, 45) CPC 3 NR NR 3/12 3/11 NR NR NR NR NR NR  
Li et al. (55) PBSC 6 0/35 0/35 0/35 0/35 NR NR 1/35 NR 1/35 2/35  
Losordo et al. (57) CD34+ cells 12 0/18 0/6 NA NA 2/6 2/18 1/6 0/18 3/6 7/18  
MAGIC Cell-3-DES (40) PBSC 6 0/41 1/41 0/41 4/41 NR NR NR NR 0/41 1/41 No significant increase in coronary restenosis in cell-treated patients
Tatsumi et al. (101) PBMNC 6 0/18 0/36 4/18 NR NR NR NR NR NR NR The incidence of recurrent MI and in-stent restenosis was similar between groups
TOPCARE-CHD (7) BMMNC
CPC
6 0/35 (BMC)
0/34 (CPC)
1/23 4/35 (BMC)
3/34 (CPC)
0/23 NR NR 0/35 (BMC)
1/34 (CPC)
1/23 0/35 (BMC)
2/34 (CPC)
0/23  

BMC, unfractionated bone marrow cell; BMMNC, bone marrow mononuclear cell; C, control; CPC, circulating progenitor cell; EPC, endothelial progenitor cell; MSC, mesenchymal stem cell; NA, not applicable; NR, not reported; PBMNC, peripheral blood-derived mononuclear cell; PBSC, peripheral blood-derived stem cell; SVT, supraventricular tachycardia; T, BMC-treated; V, ventricular tachycardia.