Table 1. Comparison of the reconstructions with previous works.
Init date | End date | RSMD Casty | RMSD Luterbacher |
1669 | 1680 | 0.90 | |
1680 | 1700 | 0.72 | |
1700 | 1720 | 0.31 | |
1720 | 1740 | 0.78 | |
1740 | 1760 | 0.69 | |
1760* | 1780 | 0.51 | 0.53 |
1780 | 1800 | 0.49 | 0.57 |
1800 | 1820 | 0.31 | 0.55 |
1820 | 1840 | 0.37 | 0.54 |
1840 | 1860 | 0.32 | 0.67 |
1860 | 1880 | 0.54 | 0.75 |
1880 | 1900 | 0.43 | 0.96 |
1900 | 1920 | 0.32 | 0.45 |
1920 | 1940 | 0.43 | 0.61 |
1940 | 1960 | 0.26 | 0.50 |
1960 | 1980 | 0.26 | 0.23 |
1980 | 2000 | 0.58 | 0.40 |
correlation | Before 1850 | 0.00 | −0.15 |
correlation | After 1850 | 0.36 | 0.22 |
*The time-slice 1760–1780 for Casty starts in fact in 1766.
Square-root of mean squared discrepancies (RMSD) between the 20-yr mean maps of this paper and the 20-yr mean maps of [19] and between the 20-yr mean maps of this paper and the 20-yr mean maps of [20]. The last two rows present the correlation between our mean time-series and those of Casty and Luterbacher on respectively the common years before 1850 and after.