Skip to main content
. 2010 Mar 31;340:c1269. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c1269

Table 6 .

Diagnostic performance of rectal bleeding in diagnosis of colorectal cancer

Index test and setting TP FP FN TN Sensitivity (95% CI) Specificity (95% CI) Risk with positive test result (95% CI) Risk with negative test result (95% CI)
Rectal bleeding, secondary care
 Bafandeh 2008 4 138 12 326 0.25 (0.07 to 0.52) 0.70 (0.66 to 0.74) 0.03 (0.01 to 0.07) 0.04 (0.02 to 0.06)
 Bjerregaard 2007 83 1090 39 960 0.68 (0.59 to 0.76) 0.47 (0.45 to 0.49) 0.07 (0.06 to 0.09) 0.04 (0.03 to 0.05)
 Brewster 1994 9 150 12 291 0.43 (0.22 to 0.66) 0.66 (0.61 to 0.70) 0.06 (0.03 to 0.11) 0.04 (0.02 to 0.07)
 Farrands 1995 5 62 8 64 0.39 (0.14 to 0.68) 0.51 (0.42 to 0.60) 0.08 (0.03 to 0.17) 0.11 (0.05 to 0.21)
 Panzuto 2003 18 96 23 143 0.44 (0.29 to 0.60) 0.60 (0.53 to 0.66) 0.16 (0.10 to 0.24) 0.14 (0.09 to 0.20)
 Selvachandran 2002 82 1505 13 668 0.86 (0.78 to 0.93) 0.31 (0.29 to 0.33) 0.05 (0.04 to 0.06) 0.02 (0.01 to 0.03)
 Steine 1994 17 271 37 1498 0.32 (0.20 to 0.46) 0.85 (0.83 to 0.86) 0.06 (0.04 to 0.09) 0.02 (0.02 to 0.03)
 Tan 2002 33 121 25 306 0.57 (0.43 to 0.70) 0.72 (0.67 to 0.76) 0.21 (0.15 to 0.29) 0.08 (0.05 to 0.11)
 Tate 1988 9 40 5 76 0.64 (0.35 to 0.87) 0.66 (0.56 to 0.74) 0.18 (0.09 to 0.32) 0.06 (0.02 to 0.14)
 Thompson 2007 333 5079 134 2983 0.71 (0.67 to 0.75) 0.37 (0.36 to 0.38) 0.06 (0.06 to 0.07) 0.04 (0.04 to 0.05)
 Thompson 2008 624 9841 322 5646 0.66 (0.63 to 0.69) 0.37 (0.36 to 0.37) 0.06 (0.06 to 0.06) 0.05 (0.05 to 0.06)
 Zarchy 1991 8 222 15 549 0.35 (0.16 to 0.57) 0.71 (0.68 to 0.74) 0.04 (0.02 to 0.07) 0.03 (0.02 to 0.04)
Rectal bleeding as only symptom, secondary care
  Thompson 2008 105 4128 841 11 359 0.11 (0.09 to 0.13) 0.73 (0.73 to 0.74) 0.02 (0.02 to 0.03) 0.07 (0.07 to 0.07)
All constipated, bleeding overt, secondary care
 Pepin 2002 2 66 6 489 0.25 (0.03 to 0.65) 0.88 (0.85 to 0.91) 0.03 (0.00 to 0.10) 0.01 (0.00 to 0.03)
All bleeding, dark blood, primary care
  Ellis 2005 3 28 8 191 0.27 (0.06 to 0.61) 0.87 (0.82 to 0.91) 0.10 (0.02 to 0.26) 0.04 (0.02 to 0.08)
 Mant 1989 4 19 12 109 0.25 (0.07 to 0.52) 0.85 (0.78 to 0.91) 0.17 (0.05 to 0.39) 0.10 (0.05 to 0.17)
 Metcalf 1996 3 28 5 63 0.38 (0.09 to 0.76) 0.69 (0.59 to 0.79) 0.10 (0.02 to 0.26) 0.07 (0.02 to 0.16)
 Robertson 2006 9 112 13 470 0.41 (0.21 to 0.64) 0.81 (0.77 to 0.84) 0.07 (0.04 to 0.14) 0.03 (0.01 to 0.05)
All bleeding, dark blood, secondary care
 Bjerregaard 2007 29 114 54 976 0.35 (0.25 to 0.46) 0.90 (0.88 to 0.91) 0.20 (0.14 to 0.28) 0.05 (0.04 to 0.07)
All bleeding, first episode, primary care
 Ellis 2005 5 101 6 154 0.46 (0.17 to 0.77) 0.60 (0.54 to 0.66) 0.05 (0.02 to 0.11) 0.04 (0.01 to 0.08)
 Fijten 1995 9 164 0 96 1.00 (0.66 to 1.00) 0.37 (0.31 to 0.43) 0.05 (0.02 to 0.10) 0.00 (0.00 to 0.04)
 Norrelund 1996 45 271 9 39 0.83 (0.71 to 0.92) 0.13 (0.09 to 0.17) 0.14 (0.11 to 0.19) 0.19 (0.09 to 0.33)
All bleeding, mixed with stool, primary care
  Ellis 2005 1 32 10 223 0.09 (0.00 to 0.41) 0.88 (0.83 to 0.91) 0.03 (0.00 to 0.16) 0.04 (0.02 to 0.08)
 Metcalf 1996 5 41 3 50 0.63 (0.25 to 0.92) 0.55 (0.44 to 0.65) 0.11 (0.04 to 0.24) 0.06 (0.01 to 0.16)
 Robertson 2006 17 297 5 285 0.77 (0.55 to 0.92) 0.49 (0.45 to 0.53) 0.05 (0.03 to 0.09) 0.02 (0.01 to 0.04)
All bleeding, solely mixed with stool, primary care
 Fijten 1995 2 12 3 227 0.40 (0.05 to 0.85) 0.95 (0.91 to 0.97) 0.14 (0.02 to 0.43) 0.01 (0.00 to 0.04)
All bleeding, on paper only, primary care
 Ellis 2005 2 80 9 175 0.18 (0.02 to 0.52) 0.69 (0.63 to 0.74) 0.02 (0.00 to 0.09) 0.05 (0.02 to 0.09)
 Mant 1989 5 47 10 75 0.33 (0.12 to 0.62) 0.62 (0.52 to 0.70) 0.10 (0.03 to 0.21) 0.12 (0.06 to 0.21)
 Metcalf 1996 2 22 6 69 0.25 (0.03 to 0.65) 0.76 (0.66 to 0.84) 0.08 (0.01 to 0.27) 0.08 (0.03 to 0.17)

TP=true positives; FP=false positives; FN=false negatives; TN=true negatives.