Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Apr 3.
Published in final edited form as: AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007 Dec;189(6):1474–1483. doi: 10.2214/AJR.07.2122

TABLE 1.

Features of Hepatocellular Nodule Histotypes

Diameter (cm)
Histotype
n
Mean ± SD
Range
≤ 2 (n)
> 2 (n)
Hepatocellular carcinoma 84a 3.1 ± 0.9 1–5 20 64
Other malignant histotype 12b 2.5 ± 1.6 3–4 5 7
Dysplastic nodule 13c 1.9 ± 0.6 1–3 7 6
Regenerative nodule 57 1.9 ± 0.8 1–4 46 11
Hemangioma 42d 1.9 ± 0.7 1–3 31 11
Focal nodular hyperplasia 2 4 ± 0 4 0 2
Hepatocellular adenoma 1 4 ± 0 4 0 1
Pseudotumor
25e
1.7 ± 0.6
1–3
21
4
Total 236 2.3 ± 1.1 1–5 130 106
a

Nodules ≤ 2 cm (n = 20) included 16 well-differentiated and four moderately or poorly differentiated hepatocellular carcinomas. Nodules > 2 cm (n = 64) included eight well-differentiated and 56 moderately or poorly differentiated hepatocellular carcinomas.

b

Other histotypes were intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (n = 6), metastatic lesion (n = 4), nodular lymphoma (n = 1), and epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (n = 1).

c

Dysplastic nodules had a low- (n = 8) or high-grade (n = 5) pattern.

d

Liver hemangioma had a hypervascular (n = 35) or thrombotic–fibrotic (n = 4) pattern at histologic examination. Other hemangiomas (n = 3) had endothelium-lined vascular channels.

e

Pseudotumor included focal fibrosis (n = 11), focal fatty changes or focal fat sparing (n = 8), intrahepatic arterioportal nontumorous shunt (n = 5), and focal lymphoid hyperplasia (n = 1).