Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Apr 5.
Published in final edited form as: Inverse Probl. 2009 Jan 1;25(12):1230009. doi: 10.1088/0266-5611/25/12/123009

Figure 21.

Figure 21

Images reconstructed for few-view CT data (left) and coded-aperture CT data (right). The simulated data are generated from a discrete Shepp–Logan image. The few-view data simulate an acquisition of 25 views over 180°. For the coded-aperture data 128 views over 180° are used and each projection is masked resulting in the data partitioning shown in figure 20.