Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer Causes Control. 2009 Dec 18;21(4):643–648. doi: 10.1007/s10552-009-9485-x

Table 2.

Impact of centrifuging time and type of collection tube on 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations, according to type of assay

CLIA/LIAISON®
DiaSorin RIA
β Coefficient (95% CI) p-Value β Coefficient (95% CI) p-Value
Centrifuging time
 2 h Referent 0.63 Reference 0.05
 24 h 0.008 (−0.068, 0.083) 0.011 (−0.066, 0.088)
 72 h −0.041 (−0.106, 0.025) 0.052 (0.012, 0.092)
 96 h 0.007 (−0.049, 0.056) 0.026 (−0.028, 0.080)
Collection tube
 No additive—serum Referent 0.05§ Reference 0.21
 Heparin—plasma 0.054 (0.011, 0.096) 0.019 (−0.006, 0.043)
 EDTA—plasma −0.002 (−0.071, 0.066) −0.034 (−0.096, 0.027)

β coefficient from generalized estimating equations (GEE) linear regression models; 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations were log-transformed

Abbreviations used CLIA Chemiluminescence immunoassay; RIA Radioimmunoassay

Model adjusted for centrifuging time and collection tube

Two-sided p-value from the omnibus test

§

Pair-wise test: heparin versus serum, p = 0.01; heparin versus EDTA, p = 0.08