Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Hippocampus. 2009 Jun;19(6):588–595. doi: 10.1002/hipo.20613

Table 1.

Performance comparison of different surface registration methods.

MT Data FS Data
FOE-PRM FOE-OBJ OUR-ALG FOE-PRM FOE-OBJ OUR-ALG
Global 16.12±2.32 2.93±0.73 2.84±0.76 13.97±3.52 3.32±0.50 3.08 ±0.50
Local 16.12±2.32 1.88±0.37 1.82±0.34 14.03 ±3.50 2.81±0.42 2.76 ±0.41

FOE-PRM: Rotate parameterization to a canonical position using FOEs.

FOE-OBJ: One run of object space registration after FOE-PRM.

OUR-ALG: Our algorithm. Global: Global registration. Local: Local registration.