Skip to main content
. 2010 Apr;5(4):645–651. doi: 10.2215/CJN.04550709

Table 5.

Comparison of government-funded LC and an urban care center

LC Regional Center Linked to LC Urban Full-Care Center
Proportion of funding 45% (nonspecific supplies and staff) 55% (dialysis-specific supplies) 100%
Patient type Stabilized chronic only Any
Treatment type Only scheduled chronic treatment; no acute or urgent For urgent treatments, on the basis of phone consultation, managed conservatively, or transferred to Winnipeg Chronic and acute or urgent
Staff MRP-trained nurses Senior dialysis nurse Pharmacy/social work/dietary support linked to the LC MRP-trained nurses Pharmacy/social work/dietary support
Medical Onsite general physician Nephrologist Nephrologist only
Model of care Primary and emergency care Weekly phone rounds to review faxed treatment, lab, drug flow sheets, and intercurrent problems Weekly walk rounds and onsite coverage
Medical record MRP dialysis record with flow sheets identical to urban full care Shadow chart with faxed flow sheets and informal documentation of weekly phone rounds MRP dialysis record
Vascular access (and other tertiary care support including allied health) Organized with regional site and typically provided by urban tertiary care unit Organizes various support activities Available onsite