Table 5.
Comparison of government-funded LC and an urban care center
| LC | Regional Center Linked to LC | Urban Full-Care Center | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Proportion of funding | 45% (nonspecific supplies and staff) | 55% (dialysis-specific supplies) | 100% |
| Patient type | Stabilized chronic only | Any | |
| Treatment type | Only scheduled chronic treatment; no acute or urgent | For urgent treatments, on the basis of phone consultation, managed conservatively, or transferred to Winnipeg | Chronic and acute or urgent |
| Staff | MRP-trained nurses | Senior dialysis nurse Pharmacy/social work/dietary support linked to the LC | MRP-trained nurses Pharmacy/social work/dietary support |
| Medical | Onsite general physician | Nephrologist | Nephrologist only |
| Model of care | Primary and emergency care | Weekly phone rounds to review faxed treatment, lab, drug flow sheets, and intercurrent problems | Weekly walk rounds and onsite coverage |
| Medical record | MRP dialysis record with flow sheets identical to urban full care | Shadow chart with faxed flow sheets and informal documentation of weekly phone rounds | MRP dialysis record |
| Vascular access (and other tertiary care support including allied health) | Organized with regional site and typically provided by urban tertiary care unit | Organizes various support activities | Available onsite |