Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Apr 6.
Published in final edited form as: J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2006 Dec;49(6):1175–1192. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2006/085)

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Proportion of correct responses (partial + complete) by cumulative exposure for high phonotactic probability (triangles, squares) versus low phonotactic probability (circles, diamonds) for high-density (top panel) and low-density nonwords (bottom panel). Note that these are the same data as in Figure 2 but rearranged to afford easier comparison between high versus low phonotactic probability.