Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Apr 6.
Published in final edited form as: J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2006 Dec;49(6):1175–1192. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2006/085)

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Proportion of partially correct responses (i.e., two of three phonemes correct) by cumulative exposure for high phonotactic probability (triangles, squares) versus low phonotactic probability (circles, diamonds) for high-density (top panel) and low-density non-words (bottom panel). Note that these are the same data as in Figure 4 but rearranged to afford easier comparison between high versus low phonotactic probability.