Table 1.
entry | ester derivative | nitrosoalkene precursor | product | yield |
---|---|---|---|---|
a | 95%a | |||
b | 84% | |||
c | 69% | |||
d | 57%b,c | |||
e | 71%c | |||
f | 95%c | |||
g | 79%c | |||
h | 85%d,e | |||
i | 72% | |||
j | 73% | |||
k | 82%c | |||
l | 55%c,d | |||
m | 64%d,e | |||
n | 74% | |||
o | 69%d | |||
p | 63% | |||
q | 88% | |||
r | 71% | |||
s | 75% | |||
t | 51%f | |||
u | 69% | |||
v | 68%d,g | |||
w | 75%c,d | |||
x | 67%d |
Use of LiHMDS and NaHMDS gave yields of 91% and 94%, respectively.
No desired product was formed when using LiHMDS or NaHMDS.
An accurate stereochemical assignment could not be made since the products exist as a complex mixture of E/Z-isomers and/or diastereomers which were not separable by column chromatography.
2 eq of KHMDS and 2 eq of ester derivative were used.
The deprotonation step was performed at 0 °C to prevent freezing of the reaction mixture.
Use of LiHMDS and NaHMDS gave 34% and 51%, respectively.
E:Z ratio could not be determined.