Table 4.
Results of Final Conditional Growth Model
| Variable | Intercept |
Slope |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| B | SE B | B | SE B | |
| Site | ||||
| Pittsburgh | .06 | .08 | -.10 | .05* |
| Eugene | -.02 | .08 | -.02 | .05 |
| Gender | -.22 | .06*** | .03 | .03 |
| Ethnicity/Race | ||||
| Black | .14 | .08+ | -.06 | .05 |
| Hispanic/Other | -.06 | .09 | .04 | .05 |
| Extreme Poverty | -.02 | .06 | -.06 | .04+ |
| Supportive Parenting | .02 | .01 | .02 | .01** |
| Harsh Parenting | -.02 | .01** | .00 | .00 |
Note.
+
p < .10
*
p < .05
**
p < .01
***
p < .001
The full model’s R2s for intercept and linear growth were .08 and .17, respectively.