Skip to main content
. 2010 Apr 1;2010:786503. doi: 10.1155/2010/786503

Table 3.

Factors associated with decayed teeth and filled teeth (bivariate analyses at 10% level of significance and multivariate logistic regression analysis.

Bivariate analyses(a) OR 95% CI P
Decayed teeth (0 versus >0):
 White versus other 2.38 1.22–4.64 .01
 “Alcohol and drugs” abuse versus “alcohol only” 1.34 0.98–1.82 .07
 Units of alcohol per week 1.001 1.000–1.003 .04
Filled teeth (0–8 versus >8):
 Male 0.63 0.44–0.91 .013
 Higher social class 2.16 1.57–2.98 <.001
 Beer drinking versus no beer drinking 0.69 0.49–0.97 .031
 Wine drinking versus no wine drinking 2.11 1.34–3.33 <.001
Multivariate analyses(a)
Decayed teeth (0 versus >0):
 White versus other 2.26 1.15–4.45 .018
  “Alcohol and drugs” abuse versus “alcohol Only” 1.38 1.01–1.89 .049
Filled teeth (0–8 versus >8):
 Male 1.30 0.89–1.91 .18
 Higher social class 1.98 1.43–2.75 <.001
 Beer drinking versus no beer drinking 0.83 0.58–1.19 .31
 Wine drinking versus no wine drinking 1.85 1.16–2.96 <.05

(a)Decayed teeth cut-off median of 0 versus >0 and filled teeth cut-off median of 8 versus >8.