Skip to main content
Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer Application in Medical Care logoLink to Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer Application in Medical Care
. 1993:685–689.

Words or concepts: the features of indexing units and their optimal use in information retrieval.

Y Yang 1, C G Chute 1
PMCID: PMC2850662  PMID: 8130562

Abstract

Words or Concepts, which are a better choice for indexing the contents of documents? The answer depends on what method is used for retrieval. This paper studies the effects of using canonical concepts versus document words in different retrieval systems with a testing collection of MEDLINE documents. In our tests, for a retrieval system which does not use any human knowledge, using words yielded better retrieval results, while using concepts suffered from a vocabulary difference between canonical expressions of concepts and non-canonical words in queries or documents. For a system which depends on the UMLS synonym set for a mapping from queries or documents to canonical concepts, the retrieval results were slightly better than the case of not using the synonyms, but still worse than the systems using words. For the systems which automatically "learn" empirical connections between words and concepts from examples in the testing collection, the vocabulary problem was effectively solved, and the results of using concepts were competitive or better, compared to those using words.

Full text

PDF
685

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Haynes R. B., McKibbon K. A., Walker C. J., Ryan N., Fitzgerald D., Ramsden M. F. Online access to MEDLINE in clinical settings. A study of use and usefulness. Ann Intern Med. 1990 Jan 1;112(1):78–84. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-112-1-78. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Hersh W. R., Hickam D. H., Leone T. J. Words, concepts, or both: optimal indexing units for automated information retrieval. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care. 1992:644–648. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Hersh W., Hickam D. H., Haynes R. B., McKibbon K. A. Evaluation of SAPHIRE: an automated approach to indexing and retrieving medical literature. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care. 1991:808–812. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Salton G., Buckley C. Global text matching for information retrieval. Science. 1991 Aug 30;253(5023):1012–1015. doi: 10.1126/science.253.5023.1012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Salton G. Developments in automatic text retrieval. Science. 1991 Aug 30;253(5023):974–980. doi: 10.1126/science.253.5023.974. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Yang Y., Chute C. G. An application of least squares fit mapping to clinical classification. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care. 1992:460–464. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer Application in Medical Care are provided here courtesy of American Medical Informatics Association

RESOURCES