Skip to main content
. 2009 May;18(5):725–732. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2008.0903

Table 3.

Fibroid and Symptom Characteristics for Treated and Untreated Participants in Fibroid Growth Study, Enrollment 2001–2004a

Characteristic Nontreatment n (%) Treatment n (%) Characteristic Nontreatment n (%) Treatment n (%)
Age     Tolerance of current symptoms    
 <30 5 (7) 4 (8)  Satisfied 34 (50) 14 (30)
 30–34 14 (21) 10 (21)  Mixed feelings 20 (29) 11 (23)
 35–39 9 (13) 14 (29)  Dissatisfied 10 (15) 9 (19)
 40–44 18 (26) 15 (21)  Very dissatisfied 4 (6) 13 (28)
 45+ 22 (32) 5 (10)  Missing 0 1
    p = 0.12     p < 0.01
Time since initial diagnosis of fibroids (years) Stress scale        
 <1 21 (32) 12 (26)  Mean 31.4 33.3
 1–2 16 (25) 10 (21)  SD 17.0 18.6
 3–5 9 (14) 10 (21)  Range 4–67 0–75
 5–9 10 (15) 9 (19)  Missing 0 0
 10+ 9 (14) 6 (13)     p = 0.68
 Missing 4        
    p = 0.65      
Uterine volume (cm3)b     Pain scale    
 <100 5 (7) 4 (8)  Mean 27.0 38.7
 100–299 30 (44) 17 (35)  SD 23.4 25.9
 300–499 14 (21) 9 (19)  Range 0–100 0–87.5
 500–999 12 (18) 11 (23)  Missing 2 1
 1000+ 7 (10) 7 (15)     p = 0.02
    p = 0.42      
Number of fibroidsc     Bleeding-problem scale    
 1 5 (7) 4 (8)  Mean 23.7 46.6
 2 9 (13) 5 (10)  SD 24.1 33.8
 3–5 15 (22) 8 (17)  Range 0–100 0–100
 6–10 20 (29) 15 (31)  Missing 0 2
 >10 19 (28) 16 (33)     p < 0.001
    p = 0.58      
Hormone use     Amount-of-bleeding scale    
 None 51 (75) 35 (74)  Mean 14.6 23.7
 Oral contraceptives   for contraception 6 (9) 5 (11)  SD Range 11.60–46 17.10–56
 Oral contraceptives for   irregular period or   symptoms 8 (12) 5 (11)  Missing 2 2p < 0.01
 Other hormone 3 (4) 2 (4)      
 Missing 0        
    p = 0.94      
General health          
 Excellent to very good 38 (56) 24 (51)      
 Good 24 (35) 19 (40)      
 Fair 6 (9) 3 (6)      
 Poor 0 1 (2)      
 Missing 0 1      
    p = 0.65      
a

p values are based on comparing the entire distribution of the variables in treated and not treated participants with the nonparametric Wilcoxon rank sum test except for the hormone use variable, which was tested with the chi-square test.

b

Uterine volume was calculated from ultrasound data on uterine length, width, and AP diameter using the ellipsoid formula (0.52 × l × w × AP), and when ultrasound uterine diameters were not available, the uterine volume was determined based on the pelvic examination estimated weeks of gestation.

c

Number of fibroids was assessed by counting fibroids observable on the first visit MRI. In the few cases when first visit MRI were of poor quality because the patient moved, the count was made on the second visit MRI.