Table 1.

Comparison with GISTIC.

regions found by	overlap?	no. of regions	mean freq	median conf	discordance**
COVER	✓ GISTIC	139	0.10	30	62%
	✗ GISTIC	190	0.037	37.5	87%
COMPOSITE	✓ GISTIC	162	0.21	20.0	64%
	✗ GISTIC	198	0.048	72.8	75%
GISTIC	✓ COVER	153	0.15	22.3	56%
	✗ COVER	189	0.072	8.8	84%
	✓ COMPOSITE	173	0.15	20.6	61%
	✗ COMPOSITE	169	0.058	8.8	82%

✓ - overlap

✗ - no overlap

** discordance rates with Kidd's sequencing results.

This table shows a summary of the results obtained from comparing COVER/COMPOSITE to GISTIC.