Skip to main content
. 2010 Apr;74(2):81–90.

Table IV.

Unconditional associations between predictor variables and the occurrence of Salmonella positive pooled fecal samples from pens on 10 farrow-to-finish pig farms from Alberta and Saskatchewan

Variable Levels of response β (coefficient)a 95% CI (β) P-value
Sex overall 0.018
gilt(s) −0.85 −1.34 to −0.36 0.001
barrow(s) −0.55 −1.03 to −0.67 0.026
mixed pen −1.65 −2.39 to −0.92 0.001
sow(s) Reference
Fecal score overall 0.071
normal −1.48 −3.28 to 0.31 0.11
hard/dry −0.40 −2.53 to 1.74 0.72
runny Reference
Fed pelleted feed yes 0.95 0.19 to 1.71 0.014
no Reference
Fed wet feed yes 0.57 0.09 to 1.06 0.020
no Reference
Fed on floor yes 0.57 0.08 to 1.24 0.087
no Reference
Pen cleanliness overall 0.008
slightly wet/dirty 0.34 −0.06 to 0.74 0.10
moderately wet/dirty 0.19 −0.52 to 0.90 0.60
very wet/dirty −1.17 −2.11 to 0.22 0.016
clean Reference
Pen floor type overall 0.46
part slatted 0.65 0.28 to 1.03 0.001
not slatted 0.15 −1.21 to 1.51 0.83
full slatted Reference
Concrete floor yes 0.77 0.40 to 1.14 0.000
no Reference
Nose-to-nose contact between pens yes 0.67 0.16 to 1.18 0.009
no Reference
Production phase overall 0.089
nursery/weaners −0.73 −1.17 to −0.29 0.001
grow-finishers −1.10 −1.56 to −0.63 0.000
sows Reference
Number of pigs in pen −0.05 −0.07 to −0.03 0.000 Number of pigs in pen
Pig density 0.67 0.28 to 1.06 0.001 Pig density

95% CI — 95% confidence interval.

a

Log odds ratio from random-effects logistic regression model.