Table 1.
Trial name | Treatments | Population | N | Primary outcomes |
Findings |
P-value for PO |
References |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COPERNICUS | Carvedilol versus placebo | Severe HF | 2,289 | Death | Carvedilol ↓risk of PO by 35%, and ↓risk of death or hospitalization by 24% | 0.0014 | [2] |
CIBIS-II | Bisoprolol versus Placebo | NYHA III–IV | 2,647 | All-cause mortality | Bisoprolol ↓risk of PO by 34% | <0.0001 | [3] |
MERIT-HF | Metoprolol CR/XL versus Placebo | NYHA II–IV | 3,991 | Composite of death and hospitalization | Metoprolol ↓risk of PO by 19%, and ↓ risk of death or heart transplantation by 32% | <0.001 | [5] |
COMET | Carvedilol versus Metoprolol CR/XL | NYHA II–IV | 3,029 | All-cause mortality | Carvedilol ↓risk of PO by 17% | 0.0017 | [6] |
BEST | Bucindolol versus Placebo | NYHA III–IV | 2,708 | All-cause mortality | Early termination of the trial due to no significant difference between the treatments. However, CV death rate was lower in bucindolol group than placebo (HR, 0.86; 95% CI 0.74–0.99) | ns | [7] |
COPERNICUS, The Carvedilol Prospective Randomized Cumulative Survival; CIBIS-II, The Cardiac Insufficiency Bisoprolol Study II; MERIT-HF, The Metoprolol CR/XL Randomized Intervention Trial in Congestive Heart Failure; COMET, Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial; BEST, The Beta-blocker Evaluation of Survival Trial; CR/XL, controlled release/extended release; HF, heart failure; NYHA, New York Heart Association functional class; N, sample size; ↓, decreased; PO, primary outcomes; CV, cardiovascular; ns, not significant