Table 2.
Details of follow-up for potential pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) over 12 months. Values are numbers unless stated otherwise
| Variables | Screened women (n=1259) | Deferred screening controls (n=1270) |
|---|---|---|
| % (No) followed up by questionnaire to participant or general practitioner | 94.6 (1191) | 93.4 (1186) |
| % (No) selected for additional record search for clinical details of potential PID: | 17.3 (218) | 14.0 (178) |
| Participant or general practitioner reported PID* | 12 | 9 |
| Laparoscopy | 16 | 24 |
| Visited doctor for abdominal or pelvic pain | 108 | 95 |
| Treated for urinary tract infection | 50 | 22 |
| Reported 3 of 4 symptoms† but did not report seeing doctor | 32 | 28 |
*Some participants were in more than one category, but each is included only once, in hierarchical order.
†Pelvic pain, dyspareunia, bleeding between menstrual periods, or abnormal vaginal discharge.